Op-Ed: Treatment of Invasive Species
How to Deal With Invasives
Lynn Hui
I hate kudzu.
Kudzu is an invasive vine that grows at lightning speed, a
rabid relative of Jack’s colossal beanstalk. With a growth rate of one foot per
day, it sprints along the ground and smothers everything in its path. As a
Tennessean, I am familiar with the grotesque, green-carpeted spaces common in
the South.
Kudzu is the quintessential invasive species, organisms defined
by the National Invasive Species Information Center as
“1) non-native (or alien) to the ecosystem under consideration and,
2) whose introduction causes or is likely to cause economic or
environmental harm or harm to human health.” 1
I have a grudge against these creeping, intruding, overwhelming
creatures. Birdwatching has been a cherished hobby for much of my life, and my
awareness of invasive species may stem from the fact that the avian world suffers
visibly the effects of invasive species. But my attitude is highly ironic,
considering that I come from an immigrant family. In fact, one could argue that
Homo sapiens is most guilty of being invasive. What, therefore, is the
rationale behind the persecution of these species?
The common argument goes something like this: biodiversity is
good, and as invasive species reduce biodiversity, they should be exterminated
in non-native areas. In practice, though, the issue is far from simple. For
instance, the brown tree snake is targeted by the US government, as it led to
the extinction of many birds on Guam, and both funding and research contribute
to a concerted effort to remove the snakes or contain their advance.2
On the other hand, cats are the largest cause of bird death in North America, but
the public is divided in its opinion of this introduced predator.9 In
fact, a nasty fight rages between cat lovers and bird lovers over which animal
to prioritize. Both sides find some middle ground in trap-neuter-release programs,
but such methods struggle to keep up with the population growth of cats.3
The comparison between snakes and cats reveals some disturbing
truths about our treatment of invasive species. Where is the uproar over brown
tree snakes? Perhaps our treatment of invasive species is not equal, as it seems
that killing a snake weighs less on our conscience than killing a cat. In
addition, both brown tree snakes and domestic cats were introduced by humans.
Do we have a right to penalize these species for their fight for survival if we
are partially responsible for their situation?
Most importantly (and cynically), does losing a few birds matter?
At times, biodiversity seems to be unrelated to the human experience except
through the sentimental value of fading species.
Keeping these questions in mind, let us consider why (or if) the
management of invasive species is necessary.
Firstly, biodiversity does matter to people. Or in other words,
birds are more than birds. Each organism plays a unique role in its ecosystem,
and when enough of these organisms die out, the ecosystem vanishes, along with
the benefits it brought to humans. For instance, otters and sea stars eat sea
urchins and maintain the health of kelp forests, which host a plethora of animals.
Kelp also contributes to the fishing industry, protects coastal
communities from strong waves, and is used in some fertilizers.5 Without
their natural guardians, kelp forests could be overrun with sea urchins and
vanish, taking along with them the benefits to humans.
Apart from its practical value, the management of invasive
populations is our moral responsibility. We were the ones who introduced most
of these species, and as stewards of the natural world with the capability to protect
it, we owe it to the native species to halt the advance of intruders.
However, connections between invasives and natives are not
always clear cut. On Hawaii, a songbird named the Japanese white-eye is
invasive, but it fills the role of extinct native songbirds in pollinating endemic
Hawaiian plants.6,7 Conversely, gigantic
flocks of native snow geese threaten to destroy nesting habitat through
overgrazing.8 The snow goose’s status as a native species should not
encourage inaction on the part of conservationists. Thus, policymakers have
loosened regulations on snow goose hunts, though the goose population continues
to grow.8 When we encounter these murky cases, we should focus on
preserving native ecosystems over the total eradication of
invasives.
In short, though we have no choice but to clean the mess we have made, conservation, not eradication, should be our guiding principle.
Works Cited
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Hart, David. “What’s the Best Method to Control the Snow Goose Population?” Wildfowl, 3 June 2015, www.wildfowlmag.com/editorial/whats-the-best-method-to-control-the-snow-goose-population/280168.
9. “How Many Birds Do Cats Kill? How to Save Birds from Them?” WAF, 6 June 2023, worldanimalfoundation.org/advocate/how-many-birds-do-cats-kill/.
Comments
Post a Comment